activism (4)

Fear of Death & Politics: New Book

12947098661?profile=RESIZE_710x

 

Dr. Sheldon Solomon, one of the co-founders of Terror Management Theory, recently sent me this info. on this book out last year (he also wrote a book endorsement), in which it looks quite interesting as a synthesis of several streams of thought and practices--ultimately, it puts "fear" in a pretty important category in terms of fear management and social change. I'm ordering it and look forward to see also what it has to say about fearlessness(?) 

Update: (Sept. 20/24) I bought and scanned the book (author is professor J. K. Rowe, Univ. of Victoria, BC) as I usually do, and within a few hours I could see the biases of the book's constructions. I wrote the following informal brief review and it is now posted up on amazon.ca (here is a copy of it): 

Reviewed in Canada on September 21, 2024

I like Rowe's research systematization, his sincere realness and practicality but always leaves room for diverse philosophical and critical theory speculations and even some reasonable doubt: "If these thinkers [he draws on for back-up for his thesis] are correct, then mind-body practices that can access and transform these deeper fears are central to social justice, not merely a helpful add-on" (p. 11). Great!

As a critical integral fearologist, I also don't want add-ons to how we best understand and manage fear. I want radical new contexts, paradigms, worldviews to be explored and co-created so that we don't just look at the "White Problem" (aka Dominance Problem) as Rowe calls it--which I would call "Fear Problem" and end up not getting deep enough to the "roots" (i.e., the radical). I'm disappointed Rowe goes from talking about existential fear and its (mis-)management as culprit to White Supremacy (for e.g.) and ends up talking about "deeper fears" or "existential fears". As a fearologist I see this mistaken categorical error too often, and Rowe makes it (e.g., on p. 11).

So much to gain for this good book, but fearologically it lacks depth and theoretical and philosophical rigor--in terms of problematizing the conceptualization of "fear" itself. He has not cited my 35 years of research and publishing on an "ecology of fear" and other notions, and Rowe falls into the typical mindfulness discourse of psychologism more or less, even despite his interest in philosophy to help him articulate his thesis. He uses a basic (social) psychology of fear instead of a more holistic-integral formation of study that "ecology of fear" and "fearology" can bring to the root problems in our societies--and, with these latter notions, "fear of death" does not get the hyper-focus that Rowe falls into. This limits what he can offer to the human Fear Problem globally. To be short on this critique, I would rather he take his ecological and environmental studies background, and re-frame the very psychology of fear discourses (especially, that the Eurocentric traditions have historically left us with)--and, rather pursue a radically radical ecology of fear model (or meta-theory) where "death denial" (his conceptual focus) is put into an ecological relationship with a dynamic of equally potent "other denial", "nature denial," "body denial," "Real denial" (psychoanalytically) and "fear denial" --yes, the latter is essential because a lot of evidence points to the growing fear of fear itself--and mis-construing of fear management systems accordingly. Rowe simply accepts standard (mostly Eurocentric) notions of fear itself and proceeds along a psychology of fear instead of an ecology of fear. That's disappointing. I look forward to more discussions with him and his colleagues on this really important political theory revisioning he is onto --but mindfulness tends to high-jack things ultimately, in my experience--that is, when it comes to getting beyond hegemonic discourses on fear itself. I really wish also he would have written about "fearlessness" as it relates to "fear" (dialectically and otherwise) but he seems only to have used that term once (p. 1) where he classifies Dylan Thomas' (artist of book cover image) grandmother as having "fearlessness" towards her life/dying/death. There is an entire study of "gift of fearlessness" cultures in the East that Rowe has ignored, which is too bad, as we search for cultural tools to help us in these terrifying times.

 

****

Read more…

12308910472?profile=RESIZE_710x

 

EDUCATION, it's history recently and its roots and routes, related to fear/insecurity and economics, is really important to understand and critique today. I am impressed with this particular lecture by activist-film-maker author Astra Taylor, who tells of this connection.

Go to: https://www.cbc.ca/radiointeractives/ideas/2023-cbc-massey-lectures-astra-taylor/lecture-3-consumed-by-curiosity

Read more…

I have for decades attempted to educate the general public about fear. The other side of my work is to educate their leaders. Specficially I want to share an example of how to educate politicians. 

Politics and Political Sphere

First, let me state that I have my issues with the whole political system of institutionalized "politics"--that is one thing. Yet, I have made a distinction that "politics" as institutionalized is only 1/2 of what democratic practice is about. The other 1/2 where I hang out the most is what I call the "political sphere." The latter is what we all are involved in as citizens and no politics or politician who earns their livelihood from politics ought to ever dominate the political sphere. Nowadays, the later is often talked about, in part, as "cultural politics." But that's another topic. 

How To Educate a Politician

I am not one to try to constantly put down people who become politicians. I could equally say, I am not one to put down people who become physicians, ministers, or school teachers, police officers, etc. They are people pursuing a career. I respect them as people first and foremost, even if I disagree vehemently with their practices and the system they belong to. I once, long ago, was a professional school teacher. I know that for many good teachers they will eventually become corrupted by the System of the State and Education as an institutions. Not all of the best professionals will leave the System. I did after two years. 

This blog is not about that decision to stay in or leave the institutions, that has ethical implications of course. I would ask anyone who is a politician to do the best you can and be as ethical as possible in an imperfect system they work in. And, by imperfect, unfortunately, there is an edge which is crossed often in which the System is actually oppressive. Now, if the System will admit it is oppressive, then I have sympathy. If it is in denial, then I have little sympathy for its justifications and rationale and its continuance to practice oppression of one kind or another. That's when I will go after such institutions as an activist-educator. 

I have learned how slow and hard it is to change a System that remains in denial. Sometimes one can have small positive inputs that someone inside the System listens to, but mostly they are defensive to hearing anything about their oppressive aspects as a System. 'They are bought and sold' into keeping the operation going, no matter what. That's a crude way of putting it. I also have seen and know that still 'good people' are inside those systems, even if sometimes in small numbers. Some do see the corruption and want to change it from the inside. I respect that. 

So, to be short here, I'll share a recent experience of a simple way to make the fearlessness voice heard and how to challenge the System, and its leaders (e.g., politicians) to not fall prey to fear-based ways of perceiving, thinking, strategizing and doing their job. I know that's a high calling. There's no other option however, from the Fearlessness Paradigm perspective (which is arguably the only sane way to proceed). I listened with my partner to a live government debate in Alberta on coal-strip mining where the leader of the opposition party (Rachel Notley) made a first case for a private members bill to a committee. If the bill would pass that committee it could go to the larger legislature and have a hearing and vote there. The bill would stop all current exploration and new lease developments that have to do with coal strip mining in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains in our province. I'm all for that. However, in the debates I noticed something and decided to write it up as a Letter to the Editor in the local newspaper and also sent to Rachel Notley office. Here's what I wrote for public media, as that's one way to get a much larger audience (if the newspaper publishes it of course): 

ALBERTA EAST SLOPES TALK: POLITICIANS CARBONOPHOBIC

Congratulations to all who made private member bill (petitioned by Rachel Notley) of April 13 get through the first committee so that it can go to a full hearing and vote in the legislature. After watching the live performance of the debate on how best to protect the Alberta East Slopes from coal mining especially, I couldn't help but be saddened hearing the politicians reasons to slow and/or stop new coal mining permits. Even Notley and the NDP members who spoke to this bill were afraid to toalk about rationale in terms of transitioning out of a non-renewable economy, Global Warming, responsibility to worldwide Carbon Budgets and fulfilling a commitment to future sanity for our children's sake. No, what we heard was carbonophobic small-talk rational all about Albertans. I love the East Slopes too, but we have to face our fears folks; or we'll be tweaking our society and economic policies while the floor of the building crumbles. Global Warming is real. Notley should know better.   -R. Michael Fisher, Calgary

[note: Apr. 15th this was published, albeit gutted and words changed in places without my permission: go to: https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/letters/your-letters-for-april-15-2]

----------------

So, in a very short missive like this, our job as fearworkers of the Fearlessness Movement is (at least) to carefully observe and point out (without shaming people and damning their character and careers) when fear is ruling in their work and practices and thinking. I found a way to do that in this instance. It is not that I think my example above is flawless either. I was writing specifically for a newspaper. I know Editors of said newspapers typically don't take articles unless they have some emotional juices and so I wrote more emotionally than I typically prefer to. It's a compromise to some extent. 

I encourage you all on the FM ning to point out fear-based ways wherever you see them and let's help educate and support our leaders (especially politicians) to change and re-think about how they engage and (mis-)use fear in their jobs. 

 

 

 

 

Read more…

Well, after a lot of years of making documentaries, in the 'wild' style of art, activism, and education... Micheal Moore has just had his newest film released last night (mostly on the Trump election and following disasters to democracy in the USA) and on "fear" (and "terror") of all kinds of fascist waves going on all over the world.. I look forward to seeing his latest film, and it is not because I love everthing Moore does and how he represents people and problems--the big and "wicked problems" that we have to face as humanity... but I like to see how he uses his art, smarts, and technologies to "create curriculum" for the 21st century.

I followed his work closely in the post-Columbine highschool mass shooting and how he approached the American "Gun Problem" (aka "Fear Problem") in his movie that won an Academy Award, Bowling for Columbine" (2002). 

I won't say much more at this point until I see the film, and listen to interviews of Moore... with the question in the back of my mind: "Is Moore a good artist, activist, educator?" and so far, I think he is a better artist-activist than he is an educator, and particularly I am referring to how he handles "fear" as a major topic... which runs all through all his best documentary works... in Bowling for Columbine he really was making a film about the growing "culture of fear" ... and its consequences...which, arguably, I would speculate have been brewing for a good 30 years in particular, and the symptoms are arising (e.g., gun violence) etc... and if you watch his 2002 award winning film, it is the "best" dealing with fear as a topic... and of course terror is not far away... in Fahrenheit 11/9 we'll no doubt once again see him dealing with "fear of Trump" and everything Trump represents ... watch carefully how he "teaches" us about what is going on and how best to understand fear/terror and how best to manage it... transform it... if he even gets to anything so complex... my critique of all his works (as he is a typical activist) is his stereotypes and polarizations (simplifications)--to create his stories. 

RECENT VIDEO RESPONSE of mine to Moore's interview on "Democracy Now" tv program (with Amy Goodman): 

https://youtu.be/ga5BZfV5UnA

 Most recent video (2nd one) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJLdM85Rwts&t=4s

Read more…