To great extent, fear can be attributed to all sectors of development in human and in a civilization of humanity as large. It can be said rightly that majority of people are driven by fear in their lives. However, a section of people who matured rationally are not driven by fear rather than by knowledge, curiosity and these are philosophers and scientists. The driving factor if I can express in this way, is knowledge, to know and that the true aspect of humanity not fear.
I disagree with you (Subba) in page 21 where you mentioned that knowledge is a production of fear. Deep inside man, there is a drive of knowledge.
Kant argues, “human reason has this peculiar fate that in one species of its knowledge it is burdened by questions which, as prescribed by the very nature of reason itself, it is not able to ignore, but which, as transcending all its powers, it is also not able to answer”.
It is specifically for those who are conscious of their consciousness. Very few people are conscious of their consciousness. Every human has this reason but some suppress it for they are frightened of the unknown. Those who are courageous they accept reason and continue to answer questions which are challenging them.
I agree with you in the aspect that consciousness colliding with object produce knowledge. Most of the development in this world is a result of collision of objects with man. However, there is some questions or curiosity that are invisible which take place in human mind and seeking answer to those concerns and curiosities drive man to know why are they existing. This part is not driven by fear.
Knowledge does not generate fear rather it generates confidence and satisfaction.
Again, I strongly disagree with your claim that philosophy is not possible without fear in page 23.
It is not truthful, philosophy exists and it is possible without fear. Philosophy is love of wisdom and knowledge. For sake of philosophy, philosophers do choose philosophy and that is the reason very view people do study philosophy. It is the same that very view peoples are philosophers.
I admire the work and I support most of the statements that people without fear they cannot develop and cannot discover the goodness in them. Fear is needed to free some people from themselves to discover how great they are and to giver chance to others to grow.
Dr. Isaac Madok
Associate Professor of philosophy
South Sudan Christian University
St. Paul Major Seminary
Juba-South Sudan
Email: isaacmadok@gmail.com
WhatsApp: +211915914982
1. Immanuel Kant, "Critigue of Pure Reason", editors, PaulGuyer, & Allen W. Wood, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013}.
Comments
Madok presents some basic challenges to the ontological basis of Subba's philosophy of fearism. Is there an instinct for knowledge (and reason) that is free from fear motivations? Madok says "yes" and Subba says "no." It is a larger topic that requires a good deal of careful consideration. I think one of the best arguments for the Subbaian proposition is that of Moren's philosophy that argues fear is at the basis of both faith and reason (see https://fearlessnessmovement.ning.com/blog/root-of-fear-in-reason-i...).